SOLUTION NMR
| NMR Experiment | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Experiment | Type | Sample Contents | Solvent | Ionic Strength | pH | Pressure | Temperature (K) | Spectrometer |
| 1 | 2D TOCSY | 4.0 MG IN 0.6ML H2O CONTAINING 30% TFE-D3 (BY VOLUME) | 5.0 | 1 atm | 308 | |||
| 2 | 2D NOESY | 4.0 MG IN 0.6ML H2O CONTAINING 30% TFE-D3 (BY VOLUME) | 5.0 | 1 atm | 308 | |||
| 3 | DQF-COSY | 4.0 MG IN 0.6ML H2O CONTAINING 30% TFE-D3 (BY VOLUME) | 5.0 | 1 atm | 308 | |||
| NMR Spectrometer Information | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Spectrometer | Manufacturer | Model | Field Strength |
| 1 | Bruker | DRX | 600 |
| 2 | Bruker | AMX | 500 |
| NMR Refinement | ||
|---|---|---|
| Method | Details | Software |
| simulated annealing | THE STRUCTURE WAS CALCULATED USING A TOTAL OF 114 UPPER BOUND DISTANCE RESTRAINTS AND 9 BACKBONE DIHEDRAL ANGLE CONSTRAINTS | XwinNMR |
| NMR Ensemble Information | |
|---|---|
| Conformer Selection Criteria | structures with the lowest energy |
| Conformers Calculated Total Number | 100 |
| Conformers Submitted Total Number | 20 |
| Representative Model | 1 (closest to the average) |
| Additional NMR Experimental Information | |
|---|---|
| Details | THE STRUCTURE WAS DETERMINED USING STANDARD 2D HOMONUCLEAR TECHNIQUES |
| Computation: NMR Software | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | Classification | Version | Software Name | Author |
| 1 | collection | XwinNMR | 2.1 | BRUKER |
| 2 | data analysis | XEASY | 1.3 | BARTELS |
| 3 | structure solution | X-PLOR | 3.85 | BRUNGER |
| 4 | refinement | X-PLOR | 3.85 | BRUNGER |














